# \[SOLVED\] Nam1 MQTT working? **URL:** \ **Category:** V3 Integrations\ **Created:** [April 14, 2021, 6:20am UTC](https://www.thethingsnetwork.org/forum/t/solved-nam1-mqtt-working/46704 "2021-04-14T06:20:31Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 6
**Author:** ![KanyonKris](https://www.thethingsnetwork.org/forum/user_avatar/www.thethingsnetwork.org/kanyonkris/32/39943_2.png) [@KanyonKris](https://www.thethingsnetwork.org/forum/u/KanyonKris)\ **Post date:** [April 25, 2021, 11:23pm UTC](https://www.thethingsnetwork.org/forum/t/solved-nam1-mqtt-working/46704/6 "2021-04-25T23:23:37Z")
@descartes I’m just noting that TTN told me to “Start moving your applications and devices to a v3 cluster” because they “will shut down V2 clusters in 2021” and that as I endeavored to do so, following their links and documentation, I ran into multiple problems that I spent hours figuring out. I am gratefully for this forum that helped me immensely. And I have provided some help back where I can ([Setting up Basic Station protocol on RAK7240 and RAK7249 industrial gateways - #11 by KanyonKris](https://www.thethingsnetwork.org/forum/t/setting-up-basic-station-protocol-on-rak7240-and-rak7249-industrial-gateways/37011/11)). Yes, I could have saved myself some time and trouble had I perused the forums first, but the documentation made it seem pretty easy so I dove in. I’m willing to improve the v3 documentation but I see no mechanism for providing feedback/corrections. Other community projects I’ve been involved with have made this easier, like forking a github repository and submitting pull requests. Perhaps my criticism was too harsh. TTN is a nice system (albeit pretty complex). Just wanted to note that as a casual user operating a public gateway I found upgrading to v3 more difficult and frustrating than it could/should have been. --- _[View the full topic](https://www.thethingsnetwork.org/forum/t/solved-nam1-mqtt-working/46704)._