But I am using the Dragino LGT92 with the default firmware. I am a simple user that can just about manage to set the available AT commands. I am not able or capable to programm the unit in the ways you propose. Turning the GPS on all the time for instance is not a setting that is available with the factory firmware.
Also depends on how you are using the device - if it’s for your own use, just run it with FTIME=0 once every two months for a full almanac, the rest of the time you can run with the default of 150 seconds.
Or find a programmer to alter the published source code!
But if I input the value at " Schedule downlink" it accepts only Hex 01 3f 8c 0f and not pQA= anyway. So I think i’m good. So I don’t get it or I wonder how you managed to make this example since i’m only able to enter numbers and not letters in the Payload field
No dont enter the AT command. You should enter the hex downlink command that you can find in the user manual of yne LGT92. Not all AT commands have a downlink equivalent.
Oh, you might be correct about that. For the mqtt interface you need to convert it to base64 first. But when entering it directly into the webinterface I think you can/must indeed fill in the hex numbers. I just quickly created the screenshot for you and mistakenly filled in the base64 command. So forget about the base64 stuff.
What ?? Are there private threads? I will just copy the whole thing here… Hang on…
EDIT: I REMOVED THE JSON EXPORT SINCE THE MODERATOR IS NOT VERY SUPPORTIVE OF MY POST
I created an export of my flow. Copy and paste above JSON into the Import screen of Node-RED. MQTT client, Dashboard and Worldmap must be installed in Node-RED palette.
Edit: I just tested it myself, and it works fine if you know how to select and drag to the right for a minute or so
I have put a GIGANTIC amount of time in this flow. So I do hope it is appreciated
Setup after import into Node-RED:
Go to the console of TTN.
Find your applicationID and LGT92 DeviceID
In application go to the tab ‘integrations’
Under MQTT you can setup a username and password (=api key)
Fill in the username, password, applicationID and deviceID in the MQTT node ‘LGT92 Downlink’
If targeting TTN you might want to consider FUP and amend (as in significantly increase!) the set Tx interval =60seconds option…even 300sec too often if running at higher SFs…
Also hidden later post to give you chance to edit post and remove solicitation… wrong message and wrong place for such. By all means add PayPal or Patreon links to any (e.g. github) repos you may but please not on direct forum posts…
That is only intended for testing purposes. Was really helpful for me when testing a new device. Default interval of the device is 5 minutes, but only when in motion.
I do all this for the community. I hope people find it useful, as well as I find other peoples work and information most useful. I removed the voluntary donate link. Etiquette on this seems to differ from forum to forum. Sorry if I offended anyone.
As do we all… none of us paid to do this, we are all volunteers…a few minutes browsing different threads Would have told you this approach not normal this forum. Still all good now.
We hear “…it’s only for…” all the time. That does not patch the FUP breach, also be aware even 5 mins risks breach with anything other than lowest SFs, so perhaps apply some conditioning logic e.g. if SF =12 then limit =24 per day or whatever… 30s air time allowed under FUP… if running for shorter time then logic may allow more for short period say 3hrs then force off for next 21 etc… search forum for discussions of tracker type applications. (Note: not against trackers as I have several and use regularly (daily!) for community or client coverage checks and mapping, you just have to be careful and/or limit use time…)
Well @Jeff-UK, the tone of your feedback is not very supportive.
I created a Node-RED flow for my own use. I spent an enormous amount of time creating it. I would not have posted it here if @stj was not asking me if I would share it. I decided to put even more time in it to make the flow publishable and write some setup instructions. I though the community would be thankful, but now I feel I wasted my time just to get your sour remarks.
I don’t intend to hijack this thread to have a fight about this. But I am feeling so frustrated by your feedback that I just had to write this.
It wasnt intented to have a tone and I guess others will judge if it has one - it was intended to be factual, informative and neutral.
Many of us create work related to LoRa, LoRaWAN and TTN and make it available to the forum. Many of us contribute and post information and provide assistance to the community and to forum members and our local community users. Some of us spend hundreds of hours a month contributing and moderating, personally I also give away nodes and Gateways to help expand the network and have deployed over 40 GW’s as part of my personal estate, across the 7 communities I have initiated and probably another dozen where I contribute or am active, as well as collaborating with others to deploy some 150-200 other gws…
…the key point is (on this forum atleast) we do not follow up our posts and contributions with requests for donations(*) and links to pay by Paypal…sorry if you think this means your efforts are not appreciated but I can assure you that is not the case - all genuine contributions are truely welcome. I celebrated my 4th anniversary with TTN (& the forum) just last week and think the number of times I have seen this is not even a handful…just saying!
(*) if we did a) the forum would be very cluttered and b) the likes of @kersing, @descartes@bluejedi and a whole host of current active contributors (sorry guys & girls & others genders, you are far too many to list but you know who you are!) might be very wealthy indeed and the predecessors on the moderators team and major contributors like Borroz, Arjan et al would be similarly so…
@Gruijter, your contribution is & I’m sure will be valued and I don’t see anything unsupportive, more setting the scene of what this community is with all the different contributions that people make, both large & small. There are a lot of unsung heroes out there and there are some people who have contributed in the past so that the majority of us could even get started - many of us don’t know the names of them until we dig back through the forum.
I’ve published resources and to be honest, I don’t get much in the way of but I do routinely answer questions where we dig in and I get faced with my own code that someone has taken a rather odd turn with - and when it gets fixed, they disappear. Contributing to open source is mostly a thankless activity - the only reward is knowing that it has helped raise the bar or enabled a development.
As for FUP, we, the community at large, always put a little bit of pressure on any code that implies a breach of the FUP - there’s already too much out there which causes enough posts where things are working as expected.
I’m a little bit disappointed about the off-topic talk in this topic. I can understand why those reactions are there but they have nothing to do related to the question.
So, i’m quite new in lora and ttn and for a specific use case I started with the LGT-92. But the messages were far from complete. A couple of datapoints in the messages stayed 0. (pitch and roll data). So to understand better I had to check the payload formatter or check how the downlink works.
I never worked with the downlink and after spending hours in the documentation I couldnt get it working. Thanks to the workflow from @Gruijter, I was able to learn how downlink works (in 5 minutes!!) and set the extended info “ON” (downlink: sAA=). This solved the issue for me.