Thank you for raising these points — they are well understood and not being ignored.
To clarify, we are not claiming a simple “copy” or a superficial takeover of TTN Mapper. The current deployment is a deliberate continuation focused on keeping the service operational while the future of the original infrastructure is unresolved.
We are fully aware that the technically and financially demanding parts of TTN Mapper are not the static website or the database alone, but the backend processing pipeline — including ingestion of new uplinks, aggregation, heatmap tile generation, and polygon (beam) processing. These components are central to long-term sustainability, and they are explicitly part of our planning rather than something being deferred or overlooked.
The fact that data is currently flowing and maps are updating is not accidental, nor is it assumed to be “the hard part solved forever”. It is simply the current operational state while longer-term processing and hosting decisions are evaluated.
Regarding costs and infrastructure: we are aware of where the financial burden historically existed and why. One of the goals of this continuation is to assess how these components can be operated more transparently and sustainably going forward, potentially with broader community involvement rather than relying on a small number of privately hosted systems.
On the data protection side, the situation has been addressed explicitly. The service does not use advertising, tracking, analytics, or non-essential cookies, and a full GDPR-compliant privacy policy is now in place. The legal distinction between technical processing, map visualization, and ownership of submitted data is understood and documented, including users’ rights under EU law.
In short: the “hard parts” of the system are neither unknown nor ignored. They are precisely the reason why this continuation is being handled cautiously, incrementally, and transparently rather than through promises of an instant replacement.
Constructive input on backend processing and long-term sustainability is, of course, welcome.