Introducing TTN-Mapper.org

TTN Network and Services
1

As for the long discussion about TTN Mapper - Time to shutdown there is no solution up to now. The ttnmapper.org servers as unavailabe for some days now and we see no information on schedule or problems.

So I´ll promote the alternative mapper site TTN-Mapper.org created on the base of ttnmapper.org by md_dw1. THX so far!

TTN-Mapper.org needs much more polishing but the basic stuff is already there.

Its always good to have alternatives with different approches. This keeps things evolving. I on it to have a more open approach running this time.

The good thing: We can have both mappers in parallel! Just add another TTNMapper webhook.

Screenshot 2026-05-19 at 10-54-43 Add custom webhook - TTN Mapper - The Things Network
Screenshot 2026-05-19 at 10-54-43 Add custom webhook - TTN Mapper - The Things Network978×521 31.3 KB

Then edit the webhook and change the baseURL to: https://webhook.ttn-mapper.org/integrations/tts/v3

Screenshot 2026-05-19 at 10-55-37 Edit webhook - TTN Mapper - The Things Network
Screenshot 2026-05-19 at 10-55-37 Edit webhook - TTN Mapper - The Things Network893×654 37.1 KB

Thats it. Now data will hit both websites!

For discussion in german you are invited to the D/A/CH channel Telegram: View @ttndach

6 Likes
2

I’ve added my trackers, I’m curious :slight_smile:

3

Any plans on reenabling the advanced maps? Coverage display for a single gateway would be very useful. Data per mapping-node was also useful to check, how many gateways could be reached by the mapping node from a given location and the corresponding SNR.

4

from my side i need the advanced view. maybe it will be a little bit different, but in general this need to be added. i have also some ideas but we have to wait for @md_dw1 for now. he´ s busy.

6

Thanks for your work and the responsibility to take over the great work of ttnmapper.org!
I think I’m the first one in the Netherlands :face_with_peeking_eye:, but have to walk arround to get noted

7

Thank you for sharing the service and your work.

I have build my own mapping system -not ready for public use - but I am happy to contribute to all mapping projects.

Two recommendations
a. As I wrote to jpmeijers I would like to filter the results with SF. In fact you don’t display SF at all. I suggest to add this info and filter.
b. You don’t show which gateways catch the signal. I suggest to add lines to gateway(s) that catch the signal.